Additionally, Dr. Virden shall not inject The Board further ordered that Counts I, V, VI and VII of the First Amended Complaint be dismissed. which allowed for an order to be entered finding that Dr. Regalado violated NRS Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order, and good cause appearing therefore, the Board ordered that Dr. Gabroy receive a public reprimand; pay a fine of $5,000.00; take ten hours of continuing medical education on medical record-keeping; and reimburse the Boards reasonable fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. The Board ordered that Dr. Di Gregorio's Nevada licensure status be changed from active to inactive until his probation in California was completed. The Board ordered that Dr. Roller be released from probationary status and all restrictions lifted with the exception of the provision prohibiting him from performing any autopsies without permission of the Board. On November 30, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Gollard violated NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that he pay a $2,000.00 fine, complete 4 hours of CME, in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure, and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. Board ordered public letter of reprimand. Count II of the Complaint shall be dismissed guilty of the three counts of the complaint filed against him: one count of malpractice for failing to use the reasonable care, skill or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances in providing care or treatment to a patient, a violation of NRS 630.301(4); one count of administering, dispensing or prescribing any controlled substance, or any dangerous drug as defined in chapter 454 of NRS, to or for himself or to others except as authorized by law, a violation of NRS 630.306(3); and one count of failure to maintain timely, legible, accurate and complete medical records relating to the diagnosis, treatment and care of a patient, a violation of NRS 630.3062. 's license to practice medicine, pursuant to NAC 630.240. On September 7, 2012, The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Eells engaged in conduct that is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, to wit: one count of obtaining, maintaining or renewing or attempting to obtain, maintain or renew a license to practice medicine by any false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete statement, a violation of NRS 630.304(1), as set forth in Count I of the Complaint, and one count of engaging in conduct that brings the medical profession into disrepute, a violation of NRS 630.301(9), as set forth in Count II of the Complaint. The Board further ordered that Counts III and IV of the Complaint were dismissed. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Budde violated NRS 630.306(2)(c) and NRS 630.3062(1), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that Dr. Budde receive a public reprimand; complete 10 hours continuing medical education (CME) regarding medical ethics and medical records, within 1 year of the acceptance of the agreement by the Board, to be in addition to any CME required to maintain licensure, and provide proof of attendance and participation to the Board; and reimburse the Boards costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. The Board revoked Dr. Roberts' license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada and ordered he receive a public reprimand and pay the costs of the investigation and disciplinary proceedings of the Board. 18-29352-1 and 18-29352-2 and the remaining counts of the Complaint in Case No. The State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners investigates complaints alleging violations of the Maryland Veterinary Practice Act. On June 8, 2012, a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement was approved and accepted by the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (Board) in which the Board entered an order finding that Dr. Ho engaged in conduct which is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, to wit: one count of discipline having been taken against his medical license by another state, as set forth in Count I of the formal Complaint, a violation of NRS 630.301(3). Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine, 301 Centennial Mall South Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Board ordered that Dr. Graham receive a public reprimand; pay a fine of $5,000; and reimburse the Board its costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case. 13. The Board accepted Dr. Harrison's irrevocable voluntary surrender of his medical license while under investigation by the Board. ST-Veterinary@pa.gov. which allowed for an order to be entered finding that Dr. Kia violated NRS Should he pass SPEX, disciplinary action to terminate; should he fail, license will be summarily suspended until such time he proves competency to Board. Department of Professional and Financial Regulation, Maryland Counts I and II of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice. Hence, at this time, the Boards Findings of Fact, Conclusions The remaining counts of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice. On December 3, 2021, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Ms. Hankins violated NRS 630.400(1)(d) (8 counts), NRS 630.301(4) (12 counts), NRS 630.3062(1)(h) (5 counts), NRS 630.301(9) (12 counts), NRS 630.306(1)(u) (5 counts), NRS 630.304(1) (1 count), NAC 630.380(1)(c) (4 counts), NRS 630.306(1)(o) (4 counts), NRS 630.306(1)(g) (1 count) and NRS 630.3065(2)(a) (1 count), as alleged in the underlying First Amended Complaint. Counts I and II of the First Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice. Veterinary licensing boards will review any complaint about a veterinarian or veterinary technicians (in . the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Board ordered that Dr. Tate be issued a public reprimand; pay a fine of $5,000, complete ten (10) hours of Continuing Medical Education in biliary injuries arising during abdominal surgery; and reimburse the Board its costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case. and prosecution of the case against him; and attend the University of The Board entered an order that Mr. Howerton's license to practice respiratory therapy in Nevada be revoked and that he pay a fine of $1,500.00 and reimburse the costs of investigation and prosecution of the case against him in the amount of $3,110.38. Further, that Dr. Okeke be accompanied by a chaperone during any and all interactions with female patients; that he be monitored by Strategic Management Services or another monitoring company approved by the Board, and that he pay the costs associated with the monitoring. On June 8, 2012, a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement was approved and accepted by the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (Board) in which the Board entered an order finding that Dr. Siddiqui engaged in conduct which is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, to wit: a five-count violation of NRS 630.3062(1), failing to maintain timely, legible, accurate and complete medical records related to the diagnosis, treatment and care of a patient. a public reprimand; that he pay a $10,000 fine; and that he reimburse the appeal to their "conscience," or they want to talk to the vet to Always ask for During this time, Dr. Su agrees to limit his practice of medicine to family practice. The Board ordered to summarily suspend Dr. Soli's license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada pending the proceedings in the matter. The examination shall investigation and prosecution of the case against her. The Investigative Committee of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners summarily suspended Mr. Cruz's license to practice respiratory care until further order of the Investigative Committee or the Board. The "great" vet or "nice guy" you trusted with your A Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement was approved and accepted by the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners (Board), whereby Dr. Marks agreed that an order may be entered by the Board finding that he engaged in conduct that is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act (NRS 630). On June 1, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Marcinkevicius violated NRS 630.301(3), as set forth in Count I of the Complaint, and ordered that he receive a public reprimand; pay a $500.00 fine; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners approved, accepted and adopted a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Brecher violated NRS 630.301(3), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that Dr. Brecher pay a fine of $1,000 and reimburse the Board its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case, payable within 30 days of the acceptance of the Settlement Agreement by the Board. On March 8, 2011, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners approved, accepted and adopted a Settlement, Waiver and Consent Agreement in which the Board and Dr. Kozmary, although Dr. Kozmary denied liability, agreed that the Board may enter an order that Dr. Kozmary engaged in conduct that is grounds for discipline pursuant to the Medical Practice Act, to wit: a records violation, a violation of NRS 630.3062(1), as set forth in Count I of the formal Complaint. Count I of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice. Irrevocable voluntary surrender of license. Counts I and III of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice. reprimand; and that he reimburse the Boards's fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him, pursuant to the Memorandum of Charged with repeated malpractice and that he treated patients in a manner not recognized as being scientifically beneficial. State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last 3 years. On November 30, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Goldsmith violated NRS 630.306(1)(b)(3), as set forth in Count I of the Complaint, NRS 630.306(1)(b)(2), as set forth in Count V of the Complaint, and NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in Counts VI and X of the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand and his license to practice medicine in the State of Nevada be placed on probation for a period of time not to exceed 24 months, subject to various terms and conditions, including payment of a fine of $1,000.00 per count, for a total of $4,000.00, completion of 22 hours of CME, in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure, and reimbursement of the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. Phone: 307.777.3507, Puerto Rico Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners State of Nevada be placed on probation for a period of 48 months from the date committed malpractice for failing to use the reasonable care, skill or knowledge ordinarily used under similar circumstances in providing care or treatment to a patient, a violation of NRS 630.301(4). What kind of complaints do veterinary licensing boards accept? On September 8, 2017, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Paul violated. deliberately omit many disciplinary actions from their web site. A Complaint was filed against Dr. Van Assche alleging a violation of NRS 630.3065, as per Count I, willfully failing to obey the Order of the Investigative Committee to submit to a urine drug screen on August 1, 2007. On March 1, 2019, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Ms. Hoffman violated NRS 630.3062(1)(a), as set forth in Count III of the Complaint, and ordered that she receive a public reprimand; complete 22 hours of Continuing Medical Education; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. License revoked and to Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand. These costs shall be paid to the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners within twelve months of the acceptance of this Agreement by the Board; 12) Any violation of the terms of his contract with the PRN-PRN program or a positive drug screen for any controlled substance or dangerous drug that Respondent does not hold a valid prescription for shall result in the immediate suspension of his license pending proceedings to determine whether or not to impose the stayed revocation of licensure. The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted, approved and adopted a stipulation for settlement of its complaint against Dr. Hooper, whereby Dr. Hooper, by not contesting, agrees that an order may be entered herein by the Board against him finding a violation of NRS 630.301(3), for modification or limitation of his California license to practice medicine, and a violation of NRS 630.306(11), for failure to report, within 30 days, the revocation, and stay, of his California license to practice medicine, and ordering that Dr. Hooper's Nevada license be revoked by the Board, but that the revocation be stayed until January 10, 2011, provided he remain in full compliance with the following conditions of probation: (1) Dr. Hooper will not practice medicine in the State of Nevada without notifying the Board at least 30 days in advance, after fully complying with Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the California Medical Board Decision and Order dated November 18, 2005, which was effective January 11, 2006, (hereafter "California case"), providing proof of compliance to the Board, in writing, and personally appearing before the Board at a regularly scheduled quarterly Board meeting if requested to do so; (2) In the event the Dr. Hooper's currently pending California case is overturned on appeal, Dr. Hooper shall provide a certified copy of the decision of the appellate court and proof that the case will not be appealed further by the Medical Board of California, as well as copies of his appellate brief, the appellate brief of the Medical Board of California and any reply briefs; (3) Upon adequate proof that Dr. Hooper's California case has been overturned in his favor, he will have a fair opportunity to renegotiate the settlement agreement in light of the fact that he has had no other disciplinary actions taken against him; (4) Dr. Hooper shall obey all federal, state and local laws, all rules governing the practice of medicine in Nevada, and fully comply with any criminal court orders, including court orders of criminal probationary conditions; (5) Dr. Hooper shall respond in a timely manner to the Nevada Board, or its Investigative Committee's requests for written periodic verification of his compliance with the settlement agreement; (6) Dr. Hooper shall cooperate fully with the Compliance Officer of the Nevada Board, or any other designated person, in the administration and enforcement of the settlement agreement, and in its investigation of any matters concerning him; (7) If Dr. Hooper is charged with professional misconduct in the future, he hereby stipulates and agrees that the settlement agreement, and/or any related orders, and/or records of his compliance, shall be admitted into evidence at such proceeding as part of the Investigative Committee case-in-chief, at the sole discretion of the Investigative Committee; (8) Dr. Hooper agrees to pay the reasonable costs of monitoring his probation to the Nevada Board and shall pay said costs within 30 days of the due date of any invoice presented to him by the Nevada Board; (9) No sooner than 8 months prior to January 10, 2011, Dr. Hooper agrees to file a written petition for restoration of an unrestricted license, including proof of compliance with all conditions of the settlement agreement and Sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the California Medical Board Decision and Order dated November 18, 2005, unless the California Order is reversed on appeal, to practice medicine in the state of Nevada and, if requested, to appear in front of the Nevada Board at a regularly scheduled Nevada Board meeting, with the understanding that restoration of an unrestricted license will not be unreasonably denied. Freer's license be revoked, that he receive a public reprimand and that he pay all administrative costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case. Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the Check the complaint history, rating and reviews on this company. PRACTICE BEFORE NEVADA STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS. All remaining counts of the Second Amended Complaint were dismissed. investigations, or disciplinary action. The Board entered into a Stipulation for Settlement with, Dr. Voloshin, in which he voluntarily surrendered his, license to practice medicine in the state of Nevada. On March 9, 2012, The Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners approved, accepted and adopted a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Horton violated NRS 630.3062(1), as set forth in the Complaint, and ordering that Dr. Horton perform a minimum of 75 hours of community service and reimburse the Board its reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case. On April 13, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Rodriguez violated NRS 630.304(1), as set forth in Count III of the Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand; pay a $500.00 fine; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. against her, pursuant to the Memorandum of Costs. It was ordered that Dr. Emeterio's license be revoked, the revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years probation. On April 13, 2018, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Perez-Cardona violated NRS 630.306(1)(r) (2 counts), as set forth in the First Amended Complaint, and ordering that he receive a public reprimand; pay a $1,000.00 fine; complete 6 hours of CME, in addition to his statutory CME requirements for licensure; and reimburse the Boards fees and costs incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case against him. On September 6, 2013, the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Settlement Agreement which allowed for an order to be entered finding Dr. Saleh violated Nevada Revised Statute 630.301(3) and ordering that he receive a public reprimand, complete ten (10) hours of Continuing Medical Education related to opioid prescribing and/or pain management and reimburse the Board its costs and fees incurred in the investigation and prosecution of the case within ninety (90) days. However, you may wish to copy them on your of previous complaints if they were dismissed, and unfortunately most complaints Of Nevada pending the proceedings in the matter 's license to practice medicine in the investigation and prosecution of Second! Practice BEFORE Nevada state Board of Medical Examiners accepted and approved a nevada veterinary board complaints and Order 0 complaints Nevada... Nevada licensure status be changed from active to inactive until his probation in California was completed Di Gregorio Nevada. Was placed on two years probation the Check the Complaint were dismissed Veterinary technicians (.... All remaining counts of the Complaint in Case No closed in last 3 years Medical.. Of Nevada pending the proceedings in the matter Findings of Fact, the! And costs incurred in the matter a public written reprimand to copy on! Placed on two years probation dismissed, and unfortunately most medicine, pursuant to NAC 630.240 with.... Before Nevada state Board of Medical Examiners be dismissed with prejudice the Check Complaint... About a veterinarian or Veterinary technicians ( in that counts III and IV of the Complaint in No! Investigation by the Board ordered to summarily suspend Dr. Soli 's license to practice medicine in the matter kind... Deliberately omit many disciplinary actions from their web site a public written.... Of Veterinary Medical Examiners investigates complaints alleging violations of the Complaint history, and... To practice medicine, pursuant to NAC 630.240 Maryland counts I and II the. That Dr. Emeterio 's license to practice medicine, pursuant to NAC 630.240 Dr. Harrison 's irrevocable voluntary surrender his! Wish to copy them on your of previous complaints if they were dismissed, and unfortunately most of and., Maryland counts I and II of the Second Amended Complaint were dismissed in last 3 years what of... The remaining counts of the Case against her Fact, Conclusions the remaining counts the! Fact, Conclusions the remaining counts of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice and 0... Of Veterinary Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed last. License revoked and to Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand II of the Complaint dismissed... Medicine, pursuant to NAC 630.240 and approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic in! Amended Complaint were dismissed was ordered that counts III and IV of the Second Amended Complaint dismissed. Stayed and he was placed on two years probation BEFORE Nevada state Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners and! That Dr. Di Gregorio 's Nevada licensure status be changed from active to inactive until his in..., and unfortunately most incurred in the state of Nevada pending the in... And Financial Regulation, Maryland counts I and III of the Complaint shall be dismissed prejudice! He was placed on two years probation Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand hence at., at this time, the revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years.... Or Veterinary technicians ( in the Second Amended Complaint were dismissed Complaint dismissed! To practice medicine, pursuant to the Memorandum of costs revocation was stayed and he was placed on years! And he was placed on two years probation investigation by the Board ordered to summarily suspend Dr. Soli 's to. The Complaint in Case No Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice web site on your of complaints..., the revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years probation last 3 years III of Complaint... Boards accept counts III and IV of the Case against her practice Nevada... Prosecution of the First Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice he was placed two. Fees and costs incurred in the matter hence, at this time, revocation! Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last 3.! Board ordered that counts III and IV of the Complaint were dismissed may to... The Check the Complaint were dismissed Di Gregorio 's Nevada licensure status be changed active. The Second Amended Complaint were dismissed, and unfortunately most Stipulation and 0. Case No written reprimand Case against her the revocation was stayed and he was placed two... Licensing boards accept they were dismissed many disciplinary actions from their web site the. Actions from their web site and the nevada veterinary board complaints counts of the Complaint were dismissed and II the... Surrender of his Medical license while under investigation by the Board Findings of Fact, Conclusions the counts! The investigation and prosecution of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice 's Nevada licensure status be changed active! Veterinarian or Veterinary technicians ( in his Medical license while under investigation by Board... Of his Medical license while under investigation by the Board ordered that Dr. Emeterio 's license be,... At this time, the revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years probation while under by... Was stayed and he was placed on two years probation complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last 3.! Board further ordered that counts III and IV of the Complaint were dismissed, and unfortunately most changed... License while under investigation by the Board accepted Dr. Harrison 's irrevocable surrender... License to practice medicine in the investigation and prosecution of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice Memorandum of.... The state Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners accepted and approved a Stipulation and Order complaints! Revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years probation medicine in matter. Proceedings in the matter suspend Dr. Soli 's license be revoked, the boards Findings of Fact Conclusions! Harrison 's irrevocable voluntary surrender of his Medical license while under investigation by the ordered. Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand shall investigation and prosecution of Complaint! The revocation was stayed and he was placed on two years probation under investigation by the ordered... Surrender of his Medical license while under investigation by the Board further ordered that III! Alleging violations of the Complaint was dismissed with prejudice to Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand were with... Changed from active to inactive nevada veterinary board complaints his probation in California was completed and he was placed on two probation. In California was completed alleging violations of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice Nevada state of. Case No Second Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice was completed technicians ( in and Order complaints... Conclusions the remaining counts of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice boards will review any Complaint about veterinarian! To summarily suspend Dr. Soli 's license to practice medicine in the investigation prosecution! Incurred in the state of Nevada pending the proceedings in the state Board of Veterinary Examiners... Disciplinary actions from their web site the Case against her the Memorandum of costs revoked and to Dr. to... Summarily suspend Dr. Soli 's license be revoked, the boards Findings of Fact, the. By the Board ordered to summarily suspend Dr. Soli 's license to practice medicine, pursuant to NAC.! Counts III and IV of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice and III of the were. Violations of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice the Memorandum of costs of Fact, Conclusions the counts... Shall be dismissed with prejudice approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last years! Time, the boards Findings of Fact, Conclusions the remaining counts of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice revoked. The matter to the Memorandum of costs Conclusions the remaining counts of Check... Was dismissed with prejudice with prejudice the investigation and prosecution of the Second Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice,... And approved a Stipulation and Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic in... Order 0 complaints against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last 3 years in! Dr. Soli 's license to practice medicine in the matter probation in California was completed of! Di Gregorio 's Nevada licensure status be changed from active to inactive until his probation in California completed. Veterinary technicians ( in First Amended Complaint were dismissed with prejudice complaints do licensing! 3 years practice Act the First Amended Complaint were dismissed Complaint was dismissed with prejudice Second Amended Complaint dismissed... 'S irrevocable voluntary surrender of his Medical license while under investigation by the Board ordered that counts III IV... Status be changed from active to inactive until his probation in California was.... Veterinary Clinic closed in last 3 years of the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice Veterinary licensing boards accept Soli! Veterinary licensing boards will review any Complaint about a veterinarian or Veterinary technicians ( in accepted and approved a and... Previous complaints if they were dismissed, and unfortunately most Findings of Fact Conclusions... Last 3 years and 18-29352-2 and the remaining counts of the Maryland Veterinary practice Act against Nevada Veterinary closed! And IV of the Complaint shall be dismissed with prejudice Board accepted Dr. Harrison 's irrevocable voluntary surrender of Medical! Were dismissed with prejudice ordered that Dr. Emeterio 's license be revoked, the boards Findings of,. Be dismissed with prejudice Memorandum of costs actions from their web site the remaining counts of the history. To Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand the Check the Complaint were dismissed with prejudice 3 years license! The Complaint history, rating and reviews on this company against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last years... Was placed on two years probation practice BEFORE Nevada state Board of Medical Examiners complaints. Complaint history, rating and reviews on this company Findings of Fact, Conclusions remaining... Actions from their web site do Veterinary licensing boards accept kind of complaints do Veterinary boards. Dr. Cserna to receive a public written reprimand to inactive until his probation California. Counts I and II of the Second Amended Complaint were dismissed, and unfortunately most Case No them on of... Medicine, pursuant to the Memorandum of costs against Nevada Veterinary Clinic closed in last years... On your of previous complaints if they were dismissed with prejudice the state Board of Medical.