pyramid tent features

evidence action address

in nonprofit board leadership and governance, to create this section. We partner with NGOs, governments, donors, multilateral organizations, businesses, and other research centers to conduct randomized evaluations, build research capacity, scale up what works, and promote the use of evidence in decision making. ", For examples, see this spreadsheet, sheets "Methods (Nigeria 2019 CV)" and "Methods (Pakistan 2019 CV).". Prior to 2020, Deworm the World supported deworming programs in Ethiopia and Vietnam: "The government is fully responsible for program implementation, and these programs leverage thousands of govt personnel from health and education to be able to run." "Kenyas National School-Based Deworming (NSBD) program carried out only one wave of treatment in its eighth year of deworming (2019-2020) due to the Ministry of Educations decision to close schools as a result of COVID-19." Our most recent analysis finds that Deworm the World currently has $6.4 million in room for more fundingprior to receiving any grants that GiveWell specifically makes or recommendsto support its deworming portfolio in 2022-24. "In Nigeria there are two rounds of treatment based on LGA prevalence and intensity. Other advocacy activities can include discussing: "how deworming can fit into the current policy environment and policy priorities of a government, how such a program can/should be financed, the robust evidence of impact, how a country can best take advantage of WHO drug donations, encourage program champions within government, help establish program governance structures. GiveWell has rated our Deworm the World Initiative as a top charity every year since 2013.The Life You Can Save, founded by leading moral philosopher Peter Singer, features Evidence Action on its list of best charities in the world.. OurAcceleratorbuilds the next generation of exceptional programs, taking an approach most similar to a venture capital model. Bihar 2015: "Telephone Monitoring and Cross Verification for Process Monitoring: Our tele-callers made approximately 19,567 successful calls[20] made during the period of January to March 2015. What do they do?

On a separate page, we detail Deworm the World's work by country. ", "As of September 2019, Pakistan's deworming program is supported by GiveWell directed/ general restricted funds and program restricted funds from Dubai Cares.". "Kenya's National School Based Deworming program is supported by GiveWell directed/general program restricted funds and program restricted grants (The END Fund and Epic). Thus, if we estimate that a funding gap is "10x cash," this means we estimate it to be ten times as cost-effective as unconditional cash transfers. Therefore in cases such as these, the monitors were trained to intervene and prevent the administration of an additional dose." Of this discrepancy, the report states: "The true net enrollment rate may have been much higher than the quoted 54% used to generate the sample for community interviews. See this spreadsheet, sheets "Monitoring methods and results" and "Results (Nigeria and Pakistan 2019 CV). See this spreadsheet, sheet "Results (Nigeria and Pakistan 2019 CV)," columns "Enrollment status. It is because DtWI wants to avoid people (and potentially the media) blaming the deworming pill for a childs illness.". In 2019, monitors observed the deworming process in a lower proportion of schools in the first and second rounds of deworming in Ogun State, Nigeria (83% and 70%, respectively), the second round in Cross River State, Nigeria (77%), and the second round in Islamabad Capital Territory, Pakistan (63%). Deworm the World plans to contract with a local organization to do these surveys, but does not yet have a signed agreement. We have not yet reviewed their results or methodology in depth. Note that we make several adjustments to these figures to get our estimate of total cost per treatment (see sheet "Summary" in this spreadsheet). We have assumed 3.5% in our analysis. SMSs were also used to reinforce precautions on drug administration, such as not giving drugs on an empty stomach, but only after midday meals and not giving drugs to sick children. Grace Hollister, edits to GiveWell's review, November 7, 2016. Does the board ensure an inclusive board member recruitment process that results in diversity of thought and leadership? Douglas B. Marshall, Jr. Family Foundation. In the countries it works in, Deworm the World works primarily with government staff to implement deworming programs; as it has expanded to new countries, it has started to also collaborate with non-governmental partners to support governments.8. Our default is to update each top charity's room for more funding analysis annually, though we may choose to do so more or less frequently. Paul Byatta, attachments to email to GiveWell, September 23, 2016, p. 3, In comments on a draft of this review on September 12, 2018, Deworm the World noted: "We have begun to address this issue through methodology changes in our coverage validation surveys. At that point, the districts began to pick up their share of the drugs from the depot. Anchored by a network of 262 affiliated professors at universities around the world, J-PAL conducts randomized impact evaluations to answer critical questions in the fight against poverty. Schools are supposed to target and record the treatments they distribute to non-enrolled children. We exclude the portion of Deworm the World's portfolio supported by funding restricted to specific locations. Sources for the information in the table: "RPs tend to have enough capacity that adding further school health programs would not take away from the work they do for other school-based health programs." Experience managing and expanding highly successful initiatives in an entrepreneurial environment. p. 11. we agree that this data is not ideal for our purposes but believe that it provides the best estimate we have and adjusting for baseline infection rates is an important part of our cost-effectiveness model. Conversations with the Children's Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), a funder of Deworm the World. S/he should be a proven self-starter and manager. ", Deworm the World supports program costs in Cross River, Nigeria and expects to support program costs in future Nigeria states. We use GiveDirectly's unconditional cash transfers as a benchmark for comparing the cost-effectiveness of different funding gaps, which we describe in multiples of "cash." Two IPA initiatives, Deworm the World and Dispensers for Safe Water, were spun off from IPA to be managed by Evidence Action.52 Room for more funding we believe Deworm the World will be able to use additional funds to start or maintain deworming programs. about GuideStar Pro. NDD or mop-up day. We do not have a strong sense from Deworm the World's website about what these activities involve (e.g., we do not know what it means for Deworm the World to have "coordinated logistics"). J-PAL Latin America and the Caribbean is based at the Pontificia Universidad Catlica de Chile. News, ideas, and analysis from J-PAL staff and affiliated professors. Our programs are dedicated to improving the lives of millions of vulnerable people across Africa and Asia. See cell notes in this spreadsheet, sheet "Results (Nigeria and Pakistan 2019 CV)," column "Enrollment status." For example, Deworm the World has assisted in a number of areas in India: Helped government develop operational plans and budgets, Coordinated cross-sectoral partners through the establishment of a State School Health Coordination Committee, bringing together health and education departments and other stakeholders (such as the microfinance partner SKS), Coordinated drug donation made by Feed the Children, Designed a monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system, Created government tableau for community awareness, Conducted a master training session for program, Designed training cascade for the master trainees to train the rest of the implementers, Developed materials and campaigns for community sensitization, "As such, the states themselves have to make the decision to conduct a deworming campaign; DtW can only encourage that decision by showing that it can be done and offering assistance to help implement the program in a robust fashion that involves intensive monitoring of the program. Deworm the World may be having an impact in the following ways: In this section, we consider factors that are not accounted for in the above evidence that could offset the impact of Deworm the World's programs, either through reducing their effectiveness or contributing to negative outcomes. Reports we have seen indicate that, in general, monitors observe the deworming process in the vast majority (90% or above) of schools they visit in Kenya, Nigeria, and Pakistan, though there have been some exceptions (detailed in the footnote). During household-based coverage validation, households are randomly selected, and then eligible children within households are interviewed about their experience on Deworming Day.76 We use coverage validation results about the proportion of targeted children reached, along with data on program spending, to estimate the cost of reaching a child with deworming. Coverage: Coverage is defined as the number of children dewormed according to the school/class register. There is flexibility on location, though the preference is for the Program Director to be based inWashington, DC, New York City, or Nairobi, Kenya.

Over 868 million children globally are at risk of contracting parasitic worm infections. The principles we follow in deciding whether or not to fill a funding gap are described on this page. service evidence physical marketing blueprint guidelines ", "The quality of drug storage was satisfactory in most schools that were monitored. oj forensic "Two IPA initiatives that touch millions of people in Africa and Asia Dispensers for Safe Water and the Deworm the World Initiative will spin off from IPA to be managed by Evidence Action." Deworm the World assesses risks like this through a diagnostic survey of the countrys capacity, including school attendance rates, which must be sufficiently high if a school-based deworming program is to succeed. This could have led to a smaller proportion of children being found in the community than anticipated at the planning stage. the disease burden in Deworm the World areas is on average lower than in the study areas, so our expectation is that the impact per child treated is lower in Deworm the World areas. Comments from Deworm the World in response to a draft of this page in October 2017. Deworm the World, comments on a draft of this page, October 2020.

"We help governments design monitoring systems to measure effectiveness in achieving intended program results.

Our significant accomplishments since our founding in 2013 are the result of the hard work of our staff, strong relationships with our partners, and support of our donors. A verification email has been sent to you. At the state level, State Health Society Bihar, in coordination with the Department of Public Relation, Government of Bihar, published newspaper advertisement in four dailies one day prior to deworming and mop up [sic] day, i.e., on 20 and 25 February (Annexure E.2). The first of those principles is to put significant weight on our cost-effectiveness estimates. How do policies affecting private sector firms impact productivity gaps between higher-income and lower-income countries? Historically, Deworm the World's role has included the following:14, Typically, Deworm the World hires and trains third-party monitors to collect process monitoring and coverage validation data; the following footnote includes Deworm the Worlds descriptions of the monitor selection process used in four states in India in 2015.42 For example, in Kenya, only the coastal area is LF-endemic, but worm infections are more widespread, so LF treatment efforts involve a smaller number of subcounties. Nigeria conducts biannual treatment. We plan to dramatically scale up our safe water program first in Kenya, Malawi and Uganda, and subsequently in additional countries that present cost-effective impact opportunities while simultaneously identifying new technologies to add to the portfolio. Grace Hollister, comments on a draft of this review, September 6, 2018. In this section, we focus on the cost per child treated, which is an important input in our cost-effectiveness model. In Kenya, the LF program is housed within the countrys neglected tropical disease (NTD) unit, which has asked Deworm the World if it might support its process monitoring and coverage validation (PMCV) operations for LF. Our understanding is that the most likely cause of this decrease was the national deworming program, which Deworm the World supports; alternative explanations for the decrease, such as the existence of other large-scale deworming programs or widespread changes in water and sanitation facilities or practices, seem to us to be unlikely. "More specifically, Evidence Action advocates for school-based deworming to policymakers and provides technical assistance to launch, strengthen and sustain school-based deworming programs. To achieve our ambitious goals, we are looking for people who share our passion for evidence, cost-effectiveness, and scale. We are ruthless inexiting programswhich do not meet our criteria; those that advance deliver outsized impact for millions of people. ", "In Tanzania matters came to a head in places around Morogoro in 2008.

Sitemap 17

evidence action address